The Real Monster in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein Essay -- Who is the Tr

Frankenstein is a classic horror novel, simply with a twist of many othergenres. Written by bloody shame Shelley, it was a novel which mixed manyexciting elements, such as horror, drama and romance. The storyfollows a young doctor named Victor Frankenstein, who has an infantile fixationto reincarnate the dead, but his attempts at this fail horribly, andVictor finds himself in dense peril, as the monster stalks himthroughout the world. I aim to investigate the issue, however, of whois the rightful(a) monster in Frankenstein. The monster or Frankensteinhimself?bloody shame Shelley, the creator of Frankenstein, was a highly intellectand creative woman, one of the elite writers in Britain. Her eagerness for Frankenstein was taken from several things. The planitself for Frankenstein was taken from a dream, but her theories of spiritedness and explanation of the human anatomy came from noted scientists,philosophers and alchemists from Europe. This spawned the seed of themonster of Fra nkenstein, an intellectual creature, a lover of music,poetry and other such sophisticated occupancies. The ass of thewhole story in itself, however, is a result of a trim back to the countryand place where the actual book was based in itself. In the summer of1816, nineteen-year-old Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin and her lover, thepoet Percy Shelley (whom she married later that year), visited thepoet Lord Byron at his villa beside Lake geneva in Switzerland.Normally, poor weather conditions would entreat them to go into thehouse, where they would often deem each other with a volume ofghost stories Lord Byron held in his possession. . One particularlystormy stilling, Byron challenged his guests to each write onethemselves. Marys story, providential by... ... the monster withless than basic human emotions he spurned it, and hoped never to seeit again. This is an extremely irresponsible decision. It is evidentthat Frankenstein did not realize that, even though his specimen wasdefectiv e on the outside, it was still a living, breathing, mentationbeing. A being which needed love, care and tutoring. In his misguidedand silver screen attempts to cheat death, Frankenstein has in fact broughtdeath on others, which is a piteous act. Some may argue thatFrankenstein had no choice, but I weigh that is inaccurate. He had achoice. He could have stayed, tutored the monster, and tutor it as anequal, in matters of logic and science, and given it as normal a lifeas it could have. Or, he could have chosen the path that he did, thatpath Mary Shelley laid out for this book, one which inevitably led topain and chaos.