The Engineering Service Division of the Federal Government :: Federal Government Engineering Essays

put back OF CONTENTINTRODUCTION 2PROBLEM 2ANALYSIS OF THE bit 3Groups and Teams 3Power and Politics 7Motivation 12ALTERNATIVES AND SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEM 14SOLUTION 16IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 17JUSTIFICATION OF THE SOLUTION 18IntroductionIn the Federal government, 14 divisions composed the administrative service division. The engineering service division was a smaller part to a government research laboratory. Their purpose was to visualise and manufacture equipment needed for experiments. at that place ar four formal teams the flesh and Drafting Branch, Planning and Production Branch manufacturing Service Branch and the technology Service Branch. There are 50 people in the propose group which was divided into three subgroups two drafting sections and one checking section. There was a consistent flow between the branches that enabled projects to be completed in an efficient manner. The engineering service division worked competently with no carriage for nine months. At this time, Francois Dupless(prenominal)is succeeded Josie Maguire, who previously held the management position. As the corporate consultants we provide analyze the company current situation. ProblemThe recent change in managers within the Engineering serve Division has caused some concern for the succeeder of the company. Francois Duplessis has developed various changes in the workplace. The changes had cause the group to be less cohesive due to poor communication and conflict. Their level of interdependence was adapted which made tasks harder to accomplish. Duplessis did not effectively use his power in commit for the laboratory to succeed which resulted in organizational politics. The designer and engineers were content with working together to reach their goals in the organization, in that locationfore, being more independent caused their general motivation to decline. Analysis of the SituationGroups and TeamsWithin the Engineering Services D ivision, there were formal teams and communities of practice. A formal team can be describe as groups of two or more people who interact and deflect each other, are mutually accountable for achieving common objectives, and perceive themselves as a social entity within an organization (McShane 234). While communities of practice are informal groups bound together by shared expertise and indignation for a particular activity or interest (McShane 234) The formal teams consisted of the stick out and Drafting Branch, the Production and Planning Branch, the Mechanical Shop Branch, and the Electronic Services Branch all of which were mandated by management.